[antlr-interest] Re: ANTLR grammar for ANTLR itself.

[lgcraymer]

--- In antlr-interest at y..., Terence Parr <parrt at j...> wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, June 12, 2002, at 11:45  PM, fumikatsu_moriyama wrote:
> 
> > Thanks a lot.
> > Uuu..., I'm ashamed ...
> 
> There is no shame...you are stronger than most because you actually 
have 
> the courage to look at the inside of antlr! ;) Not even I want to 
look 
> at antlr.g anymore ;)

It's not that bad--there are a few unimplemented features, and it is a 
bit messy in places because of the unified parser/lexer/treewalker 
grammar approach.  For initial viewing, you probably want to use 
ANTLR's -html option (Ter--where did the strip actions option go?  I 
think that that was -g in PCCTS) to generate a file for viewing:  the 
grammar is cluttered with actions which make it a little hard to 
follow.

--Loring

> 
> Best regards,
> Terence
> --
> Co-founder, http://www.jguru.com
> Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator: http://www.antlr.org


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/