[antlr-interest] Re: aspectANTLR sketch
mzukowski at yci.com
mzukowski at yci.com
Wed Jun 19 15:19:39 PDT 2002
The fnc-2 manual.ps has an attribute grammar tutorial. The html version
suffered a bit from translation from tex or whatever it was.
http://www-rocq.inria.fr/oscar/prog/unix/fnc2/eng.htm
Do you see any validity to wanting to override a rule but not change its
syntax?
Monty
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lgcraymer [mailto:lgc at mail1.jpl.nasa.gov]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 1:35 PM
> To: antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [antlr-interest] Re: aspectANTLR sketch
>
>
> Monty--
>
> For Attribute Grammar Systems,
> <http://dmoz.org/Computers/Programming/Compilers/Attribute_Grammar_Sys
> tems/> lists a useful set to which I would add Phillips Labs Elegant
> system (the home page has temporarily? disappeared; I'll send you
> the Elegant documentation files); a Google search on "Attribute
> Grammars" will get you more.
>
> On composition of grammars: This is a pretty important
> capability: lexers for most procedural languages look very similar,
> as do expression parsers. I agree with Ter that grammar inheritance
> isn't the right approach, but rule inheritance probably would be.
> What you describe for noweb use sounds like a "poor man's"
> approach to
> rule database management; for 3.0, I expect that we would have the
> resources (people and time) to do something more. I'd like to see a
> flexible rule database manager incorporated into an ANTLR IDE--it
> should be able to add rules into the database by processing .g files.
>
> --Loring
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list