[antlr-interest] ANTLR build and package layout

[Xue-Feng Yang]

Who is the dead horse I beated?

--- Trey Spiva <Trey.Spiva at embarcadero.com> wrote:
> 1) Yes and "thrashing" means that you are
> continuously repeating your self.
> Trashing meaning that you are putting some one down.
>  
> 
> I meant thrashing.  You are continuously beating a
> dead horse.
> 
> 2) I am not the one who has sent about 10 emails on
> the one issue.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Xue-Feng Yang [mailto:just4look at yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 3:59 PM
> > To: antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: RE: [antlr-interest] ANTLR build and
> package layout
> > 
> > 1) you said "thrashing" not "trashing"!
> > 2) you should shut up first.
> > 
> > What do you like? That's it!
> > 
> > --- Trey Spiva <Trey.Spiva at embarcadero.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > First you did not notice that I am NOT Terence
> > > Parr!!!!  Therefore, I do not
> > > have a kingdom or any loyal fans.  The term
> > > "trashing" means that you are
> > > not letting the issue rest.  Give it up.  I am
> tired
> > > of being flooded with
> > > your pointless emails.
> > >
> > > Terence has already said that he will include a
> Ant
> > > script with the
> > > distribution.  So what is the point in this
> > > discussion.
> > >
> > > BTW you should take your own advice " You should
> > > read everything you
> > > inputed!"  First read the email very carefully
> > > before responding.  Maybe you
> > > would have noticed that I was not Terence before
> > > responding.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Xue-Feng Yang
> [mailto:just4look at yahoo.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 2:14 PM
> > > > To: antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com
> > > > Subject: RE: [antlr-interest] ANTLR build and
> > > package layout
> > > >
> > > > Were I thrashing your issue?
> > > >
> > > > No, I just said:"Totally disagree!" and "The
> link
> > > you
> > > > gave doesn't talk about 'why that's bad'".
> Then
> > > lots
> > > > of your fans jumped out. That's it. You have a
> > > good
> > > > kingdom. They think you are the person like
> Bool
> > > and
> > > > John von Neuman. However, I don't agree again.
> If
> > > you
> > > > are a real scholar, then you should tell them
> the
> > > > truth. The words I inputed is nothing wrong
> with
> > > the
> > > > truth.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry to get into your kingdom.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Totally disagree!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The link you gave doesn't talk about
> "why
> > > > > that's
> > > > > > > > bad".
> > > >
> > > > --- Trey Spiva <Trey.Spiva at embarcadero.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > --- Terence Parr <parrt at jguru.com> wrote:
> > > > > Nonetheless, my goal is to make ANTLR useful
> for
> > > You
> > > > > folks.  Hence, if
> > > > > somebody sends me a fresh Ant script with an
> > > > > explanation so I don't have to
> > > > > think much, I will consider inserting it and
> > > using
> > > > > it for ANTLR builds.
> > > > >
> > > > > What more do you want.  Why are you
> thrashing on
> > > > > this issue?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Xue-Feng Yang
> > > [mailto:just4look at yahoo.com]
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 1:12 PM
> > > > > > To: antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] ANTLR build
> and
> > > > > package layout
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you know Ant?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sure, you may not think it a fundamental
> > > > > contribution
> > > > > > to computer science. However, it is much
> > > popular.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regard the comment. The great man
> > > said:"because it
> > > > > > forces users to type XML". I don't think
> this
> > > is a
> > > > > > point since only one person needs to write
> a
> > > > > build.xml
> > > > > > for ANTLR and all others can share.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > XML is not good if the data itself doesn't
> > > have
> > > > > tree
> > > > > > structure, such as, 2*3+e^(sin(x)). It may
> > > result
> > > > > the
> > > > > > data difficult to read. However, Ant is
> not
> > > the
> > > > > case.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- Matt Benson <gudnabrsam at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > The article basically says that XML adds
> > > levels
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > complexity the human mind has evolved to
> > > infer
> > > > > by
> > > > > > > reflex.  Hopefully he wouldn't have to
> > > explain
> > > > > "why
> > > > > > > that's bad."  Beyond that, I personally
> am
> > > > > careful
> > > > > > > how
> > > > > > > I speak to those who have made
> fundamental
> > > > > > > contributions to computer science.  Have
> > > you?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Just some thoughts,
> > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- Xue-Feng Yang <just4look at yahoo.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Totally disagree!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The link you gave doesn't talk about
> "why
> > > > > that's
> > > > > > > > bad".
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > BTW, I wrote several compilers without
> > > using
> > > > > any
> > > > > > > > compiler compiler. However I never
> think
> > > that
> > > > > > > > compiler
> > > > > > > > compiler is useless.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- Terence Parr <parrt at jguru.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at
> > > 06:27
> > > > > AM,
> > > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > > > > Benson wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > For whatever it's worth, Brian is
> not
> > > the
> > > > > only
> 
=== message truncated ===


______________________________________________________________________ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/