[antlr-interest] much ado about nothing

[Matthew Ford]

I agree.

I use very effective spam filtering (only about 10 in 2000/week get
through) but I let all this list through and just trash the obvious spam
without even opening it, so I have not seen the messages people are
referring to.  It is usually obvious from the subject line which ones are
spam.

matthew

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Terence Parr" <parrt at cs.usfca.edu>
To: <antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 6:51 AM
Subject: [antlr-interest] much ado about nothing


> Moderation on membership is useless as they will simply use john.smith
> as a username and we'll be none the wiser.
>
> Moderation on each message is very unsatisfactory as we'd need perhaps
> 3 moderators in perhaps 4 equidistant timezones to get decent response
> time on each posting.
>
> Do you really want to add that work load given how much spam you get in
> your regular mailbox?  A trivial word filter on this list would be
> sufficient for all spam since you are not getting your regular personal
> email in this folder.  You're going to add a big load to remove 2 or 3
> spam a day?
>
> I truly don't see how the antlr-list problem is different than your
> regular spam problem.
>
> Ter
> --
> Professor Comp. Sci., University of San Francisco
> Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator, http://www.antlr.org
> Co-founder, http://www.jguru.com
> Co-founder, http://www.knowspam.net enjoy email again!
> Co-founder, http://www.peerscope.com pure link sharing
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/