[antlr-interest] Re: SLL(1) grammar subset LL(1) grammar: proof by existence?

[Oliver Zeigermann]

sarah2geller wrote:

> Both Ter and I mean SLL to be strong LL.
> 
> Simple LL did in fact use the name SLL first, but simple LL is 
> useless, so stealing the name is ok, I think.
> 

OK, as both of you say this, it seems I was wrong. Sorry, for the noise ...

Oliver



 

Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/