[antlr-interest] Bug in tree construction generated code

[Terence Parr]

On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, at 01:49 PM, Luke Evans wrote:

> This might seem like overkill - and I guess there's plenty more to 
> worry
> about than this sort of minutia, however...
>
> Have you thought of having a 'deprecated' flag which would be used to
> control features of this sort?  Such a feature may, or may not, imply 
> if or
> when a 'legacy' feature might be removed from the product, but at the 
> very
> least it provides a 'large hint' as to what represents 'sanctioned' 
> features
> in a given version.  Probably it's nice to discourage new 
> users/projects
> from engaging features which are no longer considered 'best practice' 
> or for
> which there are better alternatives.

An interesting idea...probably too few revisions before a total rewrite 
for deprecation to make much difference though ;)

Ter
--
Co-founder, http://www.jguru.com
Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator: http://www.antlr.org
Lecturer in Comp. Sci., University of San Francisco


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/