[antlr-interest] Does ANTLR TreeParsing [still] have these "f laws"?

[mzukowski at yci.com]

Those aren't flaws, they are design decisions.  The author of that page
followed the design to customize his ASTs to do what he needed, just as I
did in the GCC translator framework http://www.codetransform.com/gcc.html.

Monty

-----Original Message-----
From: micheal_jor <open.zone at virgin.net> [mailto:open.zone at virgin.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:32 AM
To: antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [antlr-interest] Does ANTLR TreeParsing [still] have these
"flaws"?


Hi,

I came across this piece on flaws with ANTLR TreeParsers on my 
travels and wondered if anyone had an opinion.

http://www.cc.gatech.edu/classes/AY2000/cs4240_fall/ANTLR_Patch/

Cheers!,

Micheal
  -- ANTLR: "A Nible Tool. Lucid Parsing." 


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/