[antlr-interest] Re: Does ANTLR TreeParsing [still] have thes e "f laws"?

[Zukowski, Monty]

Well, you could say that it implements a code generator because it will
parse the AST and emit the code to a file.  It doesn't have any of the other
things you're looking for.  I've done those with commercial projects and am
available for consulting (www.codetransform.com), or ask away here and I
might find the time to respond (I usually do,as the archives show...)

Monty

-----Original Message-----
From: micheal_jor <open.zone at virgin.net> [mailto:open.zone at virgin.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:40 AM
To: antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [antlr-interest] Re: Does ANTLR TreeParsing [still] have these
"f laws"?


--- In antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com, mzukowski at y... wrote:
> Those aren't flaws, they are design decisions.

I thought that might be the case (hence the quotes "flaws"). Similar 
to the filename tracking issues as well.

> The author of that page
> followed the design to customize his ASTs to do what he needed, 
just as I
> did in the GCC translator framework 
http://www.codetransform.com/gcc.html.

Does that (or any other available ANTLR project) implement 
SemanticAnalysers/TypeCheckers/Optimizers/CodeGenerator using ANTLR 
TreeParsers?.

Micheal



 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/