[antlr-interest] recognizer vs translator

Matt Benson gudnabrsam at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 2 08:37:44 PDT 2003


I think the accepted way to do this is to have your
grammar create an AST, then create a TreeParser that
walks your AST and performs your translation for you.

-Matt

--- Adrian Sandor <aditsu at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> If I have a grammar which is good for recognizing a
> language, then 
> how can I write a translator for that language
> without modifying the 
> grammar? I mean I want to keep the translator rules
> separately (even 
> if they are in the same file).
> 
> Adrian
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




More information about the antlr-interest mailing list