[antlr-interest] ANTLR 3 License

Braden McDaniel braden at endoframe.com
Fri Jul 18 10:40:25 PDT 2003


Quoting Matt Benson <gudnabrsam at yahoo.com>:

> Okay, just because the conversation got interesting, I
> took it upon myself to read section six and some of
> the text immediately preceding that section.  Meaning
> no disrespect, it seems to me that (assuming he was
> correctly quoted in the POI development forum) Dave
> Turner's responses there and below are contradictory.
> My interpretation of the answer
> 
> "DT:  This sort of linking falls under section 6 of
> the LGPL."
> 
> is:  "Java code that depends on LGPL Java classes via
> import statements and/or fully-qualified class names
> must fulfill the terms of section 6 of the LGPL to
> remain in compliance."
> 
>   This is in direct opposition to Braden's
> interpretation, which has received DT's blessings this
> week.

In fact, it is not.

The point of contention was not whether Clause 6 applies. It was an issue of 
what Clause 6 requires.

-- 
Braden McDaniel                           e-mail: <braden at endoframe.com>
<http://endoframe.com>                    Jabber: <braden at jabber.org>

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




More information about the antlr-interest mailing list