[antlr-interest] ANTLR 3 License
Braden McDaniel
braden at endoframe.com
Fri Jul 18 10:40:25 PDT 2003
Quoting Matt Benson <gudnabrsam at yahoo.com>:
> Okay, just because the conversation got interesting, I
> took it upon myself to read section six and some of
> the text immediately preceding that section. Meaning
> no disrespect, it seems to me that (assuming he was
> correctly quoted in the POI development forum) Dave
> Turner's responses there and below are contradictory.
> My interpretation of the answer
>
> "DT: This sort of linking falls under section 6 of
> the LGPL."
>
> is: "Java code that depends on LGPL Java classes via
> import statements and/or fully-qualified class names
> must fulfill the terms of section 6 of the LGPL to
> remain in compliance."
>
> This is in direct opposition to Braden's
> interpretation, which has received DT's blessings this
> week.
In fact, it is not.
The point of contention was not whether Clause 6 applies. It was an issue of
what Clause 6 requires.
--
Braden McDaniel e-mail: <braden at endoframe.com>
<http://endoframe.com> Jabber: <braden at jabber.org>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list