[antlr-interest] Runtime-only JAR?

mzukowski at yci.com mzukowski at yci.com
Thu Mar 20 11:28:18 PST 2003


See the mkjar and mkjar.bat scripts in the distribution.  It could probably
use some better documentation that they make the runtime jars.

Monty

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Smith [mailto:brian-l-smith at uiowa.edu]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:17 AM
To: antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [antlr-interest] Runtime-only JAR?


Hi,

In ANTLR versions prior to 2.7.2 there were seperate JAR files, 
antlr.jar and antlrall.jar. antlr.jar had the runtime library and 
antlrall.jar had the runtime library plus everything else. As of 2.7.2, 
antlr.jar now contains everything (i.e. it is the equivalent of 
antlrall.jar) and there is no seperate runtime library JAR.

I think that the seperate runtime library JAR was very useful because of 
its small size. It is only 1/6th the size of antlrall.jar:

                 combined      runtime-only
   compressed    360K          60K
   uncompressed  685K          108K

With web-deployed applications (applets, web start applications, 
NetBeans Autoupdate, etc.), the JAR file size is important. So, I would 
like to see the runtime-only JAR file added back to the ANTLR build 
system. Actually, for the applications I have it would be best if there 
were two JAR's, one for the runtime lib and one that had everything 
except the runtime lib.

Does this sound like a reasonable change?

Thanks,
Brian



 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



More information about the antlr-interest mailing list