[antlr-interest] Re: Anyone tried this ANTLR-inspired CC?
Oliver Zeigermann
oliver at zeigermann.de
Tue Nov 11 11:58:08 PST 2003
Tiller, Michael (M.M.) wrote:
> Just to be clear, I was not proposing that we get rid of anything ANTLR
> currently does. It seems clear from the responses that some people want
> abstract syntax trees while others (doing transformation work) want to keep
> trees that are much closer to the specific syntax.
>
> All I mentioned was better support for automatic handling of imaginary nodes
> so that I could define my AST node types a priori and still have ANTLR build
> things up the right way.
I agree absolutely, this would be a very nice feature! I just wanted to
show another field of application where ANTLR-ASTs work fine :)
Oliver
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list