[antlr-interest] Re: java grammar problems
Ray Waldin
ray at waldin.net
Tue Sep 23 16:46:35 PDT 2003
Hi,
I think what you mean is that java.tree.g doesn't allow type
definitions within an interface block. This can be fixed by adding
typeDefinition as a third option to the interfaceBlock rule.
Hope that helps.
-Ray
--- old/java.tree.g 2003-09-23 16:27:37.000000000 -0700
+++ java.tree.g 2003-09-23 16:27:52.000000000 -0700
@@ -86,8 +86,9 @@
interfaceBlock
: #( OBJBLOCK
( methodDecl
| variableDef
+ | typeDefinition
)*
)
;
--- In antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com, "zhangcharles"
<zhangcharles at y...> wrote:
> I posted this a month ago. I think it got lost in the message pond.
>
> -------------------------------------
> Hi, the current java.tree.g grammar doesn't seem to take inner
> interface definition into consideration. Any advices of how to add
> it since I'm not a grammar expert. Thanks a lot.
>
> Charles
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list