[antlr-interest] would anybody object to a 2.7.4 version?

[Sebastian Kaliszewski]

Terence Parr wrote:
> Ric has made some useful changes (for example, in the build process for 
> C++) that really should be fixed.  I feel that the changes (some in the 
> string unquoting) in functionality warrant a new version.  Would 
> anybody object to a quick antlr-2.7.4rc1 release candidate 1 and then a 
> full 2.7.4 version that fixed these problems?

As just ANTLR enduser I don't see anything against that. Changes are good 
and I'd welcome them in full release (I prefer using full releases than 
development snapshots).

BTW. Will there be binmary only (precompiled ising GCJ) version shortly 
after release?

BTW2. I'd also wecome (as usefull add-on) the possibility of building just 
C++ libraries out of official release (as it was suggested in one of the 
recent posts).

rgds
-- 
Sebastian Kaliszewski



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/