[antlr-interest] Re: Java runtime
lgc at mail1.jpl.nasa.gov
Fri Mar 12 11:46:05 PST 2004
Actually, I read the original post as "I don't want to have to install java just to be able to run ANTLR". I think that that was addressed
by bringing ANTLR up under GCJ and Ric's makefile.
--- In antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com, "John D. Mitchell" <johnm-antlr at n...> wrote:
> >>>>> "M" == M M <Tiller> writes:
> >>>>>> JDM wrote:
> >> So you're wanting someone to reimplement the Antlr run-time for every
> >> single, supported action language? Ouch.
> > I don't understand this issue. The original poster asked that the Java
> > runtime not be included for C++ projects. On the face of it, this sounds
> > like quite a reasonable requirement and as far as I know it is satisfied
> > by Antlr 2.x.
> Well, it seemed pretty clear to me that the OP was asking about all
> languages not just C++.
> I asked for clarification w.r.t. the issue of wanting this done for all of
> the supported language (-- along with an implicit plonk :-).
> Take care,
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
More information about the antlr-interest