[antlr-interest] Re: Java runtime

[lgcraymer]

Actually, I read the original post as "I don't want to have to install java just to be able to run ANTLR".  I think that that was addressed 
by bringing ANTLR up under GCJ and Ric's makefile.

--Loring


--- In antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com, "John D. Mitchell" <johnm-antlr at n...> wrote:
> >>>>> "M" == M M <Tiller> writes:
> >>>>>> JDM wrote:
> [...]
> 
> >> So you're wanting someone to reimplement the Antlr run-time for every
> >> single, supported action language?  Ouch.
> 
> > I don't understand this issue.  The original poster asked that the Java
> > runtime not be included for C++ projects.  On the face of it, this sounds
> > like quite a reasonable requirement and as far as I know it is satisfied
> > by Antlr 2.x.
> 
> Well, it seemed pretty clear to me that the OP was asking about all
> languages not just C++.
> 
> I asked for clarification  w.r.t. the issue of wanting this done for all of
> the supported language (-- along with an implicit plonk :-).
> 
> Take care,
> 	John



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/