[antlr-interest] Re: Generated C++ Parser Performance

[lgcraymer]

When you write "parser", do you mean "language processor"?  If so, the
lexer is likely to be the problem--check the flex example for an
alternative approach.

--Loring

--- In antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com, "cwrenniks" <cwrenniks at a...> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Been doing some testing in a cross language project, generating my 
> grammar in both C++ and Java. I've noticed that the Java parser is 
> much faster than the C++ parser, which surprised me. We generated 
> the parser over to C++ looking for more performance, and were bummed 
> when it went the other way! Is this going to be corrected?
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> Renniks



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/