[antlr-interest] Re: "protected" lexer rules
John D. Mitchell
johnm-antlr at non.net
Mon Nov 8 11:37:25 PST 2004
>>>>> "Terence" == Terence Parr <parrt at cs.usfca.edu> writes:
>>>>>> On Nov 7, 2004, at 8:58 PM, kozchris writes:
[...]
> Hi. Local makes sense too actually. It's definitely not overloaded in
> the grammar name space, but it too has a meaning as in "local variable".
> Hmm...it's good actually. subrule is very specific, but is an overloaded
> term. Damn!
No, it runs into the same problem as with "private". The rules are
available to subclasses of the lexer so they aren't really local.
Take care,
John
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list