[antlr-interest] Re: "protected" lexer rules

[Ric Klaren]

On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 01:14:45AM -0000, lgcraymer wrote:
> I would agree.  Really, the basic idea is more that of a syllable that
> may be included in a word.  I'm not too keen on "fragment" either--you
> break things into fragments, you don't build things up from them.

Triggered by that last remark:
1. part/partial
2. component/comp
3. alias
4. shorthand
5. abbreviation/abbrev

Cheers,

Ric
-- 
-----+++++*****************************************************+++++++++-------
    ---- Ric Klaren ----- j.klaren at utwente.nl ----- +31 53 4893755  ----
-----+++++*****************************************************+++++++++-------
  "I don't have anything against Java - it's the best damn implementation
              of UCSD Pascal ever released..." --- Larry Smith



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/