[antlr-interest] On trees and JavaBeans, part 2: tree creation

[Bryan Ewbank]

So, hows about other target languages that don't have some of the
stuff assumed by this discussion?

Lots of people have been talking about:
> > > Also, you still need a tree node of some kind to actually
> > > implement a tree.  Perhaps Tree and TreeNode?
> >
> > Perhaps but a TreeModel-style interface doesn't care or know
> > about the concrete types. That is encapsulated in
> > implementation classes.
> 
> Exactly. All args/return types are Object, integer, or String.