[antlr-interest] Profiler 2

[Bryan Ewbank]

Wish I would have heard that several months ago - t'would have been a
make/break statement.  My impression at the time, from reading the
group, was that performance for C++ was on-par with LALR.  Now we are
beating on performance to squeeze it out.

Certainly, we got here faster than w/o ANTLR; however, management (w/
a performance-centric background :-) is worrying us to death.

On 12/2/05, Martin Probst <mail at martin-probst.com> wrote:
> So it's definitely possible to get good performance out of ANTLR, at
> least in Java. I used it in C++ for some time too, and results were less
> favorable, app. a factor 10 slower than a comparable LALR solution.
>
> Martin
>
>