[antlr-interest] 2.8 update
parrt at cs.usfca.edu
Sat Feb 5 10:36:57 PST 2005
On Feb 5, 2005, at 10:25 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Terence Parr wrote:
>> I agreed for BSD on 2.8e (but NOT 2.7.5 and any further bug fix
>> releases) as that was the only way. Further, 3.0 will be BSD
> Presumably the BSD without the infamous advertising clause?
Which part is that? The Berkeley ad?
> Have you considered MIT X? It's essentially equivalent, but doesn't
> lead to people asking the question I ask above. (We use MIT X for all
> new files added to E.)
> Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain
More information about the antlr-interest