[antlr-interest] 2.8 update

[Terence Parr]

On Feb 5, 2005, at 1:02 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> When we open sourced the old Xanadu sources at Udanax.com, we were 
> going to use the BSD License (i.e., the New BSD License without the 
> advertising clause). However, after the fifth time we were asked "The 
> one with or without the advertising clause?", we switched to the MIT X 
> License in order to avoid the confusion.

Even if the license is sitting in front of them and clearly does not 
have the advertising clause?

>> I do like the MIT license too...
>
> Would you be willing to switch to it?

well, if they are identical I'd probably go with the BSD license as 
Berkeley is across the bay and I have a west coast bias ;)

Ter
--
CS Professor & Grad Director, University of San Francisco
Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator, http://www.antlr.org
Cofounder, http://www.jguru.com