[antlr-interest] Can subrules be set to 'n-to-m'?
scott at javadude.com
Fri Mar 25 19:31:51 PST 2005
What about consistency with so many prior art examples (like all the unix
This would make ANTLR much more approachable, IMHO.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org
> [mailto:antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org] On Behalf Of Terence Parr
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 1:53 PM
> To: 'antlr-interest Interest'
> Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] Can subrules be set to 'n-to-m'?
> Hi. Regarding ID+ versus (ID)+ I've gone back and forth on
> this one so many times. I like the brevity, but I really
> like consistency too. So far consistency has won out! :)
> CS Professor & Grad Director, University of San Francisco
> Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator, http://www.antlr.org
> Cofounder, http://www.jguru.com
More information about the antlr-interest