[antlr-interest] votes on rule+ vs (rule)+
Chris Snyder
csnyder at alumni.ncsu.edu
Wed May 18 12:09:59 PDT 2005
+1
-----Original Message-----
From: antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org
[mailto:antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org] On Behalf Of Terence Parr
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 2:16 PM
To: ANTLR Interest
Subject: [antlr-interest] votes on rule+ vs (rule)+
Hi,
I'm leaning towards allowing rule+ as Scott and others have asked
for. I usually am for consistency, but I'm wondering if this is a
case where consistency with "standard" EBNF is better than forcing
the ANTLR consistency that all subrules have parentheses.
Please, no long arguments! A simple +1 or -1 or 0 will suffice with
a few comments if you want.
Thanks,
Ter
--
CS Professor & Grad Director, University of San Francisco
Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator, http://www.antlr.org
Cofounder, http://www.jguru.com
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list