[antlr-interest] votes on rule+ vs (rule)+

[Arnar Birgisson]

+1

Arnar

>>> Terence Parr <parrt at cs.usfca.edu> 18.5.2005 18:15:32 >>>
Hi,

I'm leaning towards allowing rule+ as Scott and others have asked  
for.  I usually am for consistency, but I'm wondering if this is a  
case where consistency with "standard" EBNF is better than forcing  
the ANTLR consistency that all subrules have parentheses.

Please, no long arguments!  A simple +1 or -1 or 0 will suffice with  
a few comments if you want.

Thanks,
Ter
--
CS Professor & Grad Director, University of San Francisco
Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator, http://www.antlr.org 
Cofounder, http://www.jguru.com