[antlr-interest] question about ANTLR3.0

[Lloyd Dupont]

I think it's.. a pun, a joke and an answer!
the idea is probably: ok, no more inherited grammar but I wrote my grammar 
based on this other one.
what if the author of the original one make a change to its grammar I want 
to use as well?

I have to merger the changes...
=> RCS!

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John B. Brodie" <jbb at acm.org>
To: <parrt at cs.usfca.edu>
Cc: <antlr-interest at antlr.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] question about ANTLR3.0


> Greetings!
>
> Terence Parr replied, in part, to Lloyd Dupont:
>
> Lloyd>> for example being able to declare method in a subgrammar, without
> Lloyd>> needing to copy paste all super-grammar code?
>
> Ter> I will be creating another mechanism based upon RCS :)
>
> and I ask about .....................................^^^
>
> RCS is Revision Control System ... or ... ???
> (sorry if this has already been discussed here)
>
> Thanks
>   -jbb