[antlr-interest] xml grammar

Bryan Ewbank ewbank at gmail.com
Wed Nov 16 02:21:21 PST 2005


Perhaps I'm over-simplifying, but in XML isn't it easier to reverse
your thought processes, so that everything from ">" to "<" is slurped
as data, very much like a classic text string?

It would seem that the content (as opposed to the XML-isms) are simply
raw goo that you don't want to process in any case - so treat it as
something that is opaque.


More information about the antlr-interest mailing list