[antlr-interest] Conceptual problem with look ahead
Michael Sielemann
michael.sielemann at asdl.gatech.edu
Tue Sep 27 16:26:15 PDT 2005
Hi everybody,
I mostly finished writing the lexer for my first grammar right now and came
across something, which points me at a conceptual misunderstanding. I read
the related FAQ entries but could not figure this out. I would be happy to
receive any input you guys might have on this.
In my lexer, I have the following rule for multi-line comments in C/C++
fashion (it's basically the rule from the C grammar at
http://www.antlr.org/grammar/cgram/grammars/StdCParser.g).
COMMENTML : "/*"
( { LA(2) != '/' }? '*'
| ( '\r' ('\n')?)
| ~( '*'| '\r' | '\n' )
)*
"*/" {$setType(Token.SKIP);}
;
If I set k=2 for this lexer, ANTLR tells me that the choices are ambiguous:
ANTLR Parser Generator Version 2.7.5 (20050201) 1989-2005 jGuru.com
lexical nondeterminism upon
k==1:'*'
k==2:'/'
between alt 1 and exit branch of block
When I set k to three, everything is fine.
My understanding is that the look-ahead length for lexers exactly
corresponds to characters. Alternative one checks whether a star would be
okay by looking at the following character - is it a dash or not. The exit
branch is "*/" if I am not mistaken. As these two constructs only look at
the next two characters, I expected everything to be fine. But obviously it
isn't. Even with the "anything can follow" concept I don't really get this.
The problem might be that I am not a CS guy but come from engineering, but
anyway....
Thank you very much for your help,
Michael
PS: One short second question concerning the lexers. If I want to refer to
the single quote ' as a single character in ANTLR, is the escape
sequence '\'' okay? I think that it is not a classical C escape sequence but
it seems to be what corresponds best. Thanks.
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list