[antlr-interest] v3: question to usage options
Dieter Frej
dieter_frej at gmx.net
Wed Aug 16 07:58:18 PDT 2006
yeap, was generated fine without any problems. Then I am going to change
the header of the grammar. I made some other changes to it as well to
get it more spec conform (mostly rule names changed). I am going to send
it soon.
Thanks
- Didi
Micheal J wrote:
> Dieter,
>
>> you wrote that the current java.g grammar should be generated
>> with java -Xms200M -Xmx400M org.antlr.Tool -dfa -nfa
>> -Xmaxdfaedges 65534 java.g But how do you know that it has to
>> be generated this way? Simply because that was the only way
>> it was generated at all? Because java -Xms200M -Xmx300M
>> org.antlr.Tool java.g is also working. Is that any
>> better/worse than adding the whole bunch of options you used
>> in the first run?
>
> At the time the grammar was created, it was needed for ANTLR to successfully
> generate the DFA tables. Since then the implementation of cyclic DFA
> generation has changed significantly and this may no longer be required in
> fact.
>
> Did you try it without any switches
>
> Micheal
>
>
> -----------------------
> The best way to contact me is via the list/forum. My time is very limited.
>
>
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list