[antlr-interest] 2.7.6 makes more output files than 2.7.5?

Matt Benson gudnabrsam at yahoo.com
Tue Jan 24 13:29:32 PST 2006


Oh, your first reply "we decided not to update the
antlr task" referred to the one in Ant.  Right, a
rewritten task would be best hosted by ANTLR.  The
current task, from what I recall, is just not as
flexible as it could be... oh well.  :)

-Matt

--- Scott Stanchfield <scott at javadude.com> wrote:

> I'd have to dig up the notes, but the folks I
> chatted with said that the
> new ant policy was that tool-specific tasks should
> be deployed with the
> tool; they didn't want tool-specific tasks to be
> part of ant (nasty
> maintenance...). I told them I'd work with Ter to
> get a new ant task
> deployed with antlr.
> 
> However, the changes I was going to have in the ant
> task became moot once
> I split out ANTXR (http://javadude.com/tools/antxr)
> from ANTLR, so I
> dropped the whole thing.
> 
> The current task that comes with ant should still
> work (other than the
> regression test breakage that you fixed).
> 
> Sorry for the confusion!
> -- Scott
> 
> > Hmm... I'm not a user, I'm the Ant gang. 
> Apparently I
> > missed the end result of the conversation on the
> > task... or was not part of some other discussion
> with
> > some other part of the Ant gang.
> >
> > br,
> > Matt
> >
> > --- Scott Stanchfield <scott at javadude.com> wrote:
> >
> >> After working with the ant gang, we decided not
> to
> >> update the antlr task.
> >>
> >> I'd recommend using the existing task unless you
> >> need a new option, in which
> >> case you can always use the <java> task instead.
> >>
> >> Sorry...
> >> --Scott
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabrsam at yahoo.com]
> >> > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 12:47 PM
> >> > To: Scott Stanchfield; Antlr List
> >> > Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] 2.7.6 makes more
> >> output files
> >> > than 2.7.5?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks, Scott.  They were breaking a unit test
> for
> >> the Ant
> >> > task; I modified the test to ignore them.  Any
> >> update on the
> >> > proposed rewrite of the task?
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


More information about the antlr-interest mailing list