[antlr-interest] 3.0 final will require t.g has t in it
Micheal J
open.zone at virgin.net
Fri Jul 7 19:14:05 PDT 2006
> > On Jul 7, 2006, at 5:45 PM, Sohail Somani wrote:
> > Are we also going to require that *only* t exists in t.g?
> >
> On Jul 8, 2006, at 02:06 AM, Terence Parr wrote:
> Yep. One grammar per file.
>
> Ter
Did you mean one explicit grammar per file?. IIRC, parser grammars can
define a lexer implicitly.
Incidentally, (a) how would such a lexer be named? and, (b) was the @header
issue resolved? (i.e. @header contents not getting into implicitly defined
lexers).
Micheal
-----------------------
The best way to contact me is via the list/forum. My time is very limited.
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list