[antlr-interest] Tree Recursion (matching problem).

[Bryan Ewbank]

Hi Craig,

Don't call it "stupid" - or else we are all stupid at some time or other.
It's part of the learning process and can safely be called education
instead.  Those lessons that are a bit painful, but overall harmless, are
the best to learn - and they will not be forgotten.

Thanks for letting us observe the discovery process, and reminding us that
there are some mistakes we all make at some point or other

- Bryan

On 6/18/06, Craig Main <craig at palantir.co.za> wrote:
>
> I apologise in advance for having a conversation with myself in the
> mailing
> list, but I figured out the problem and thought I would respond in to
> avoid
> wasting anyone's precious time.
>
> The problem was that I had stupidly specified:
> expression : #(PLUS l=term r=term) // goes too deep to recurse later on?
>
> Instead of:
> expression : #(PLUS l=expression r=expression) // correct children.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.antlr.org/pipermail/antlr-interest/attachments/20060618/f653fba6/attachment.html