[antlr-interest] [antlr-dev] target ETAs?

[Jim Idle]

I already have my own system agnostic commands for that, built for
another project I once worked on. However, in this case, I just
programmed it in C anyway as I was interested in general performance of
system agnostic C on Windows. As the grammar drives what actually
happens at runtime, this is good enough.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org
[mailto:antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org] On Behalf Of Stuart Dootson
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 8:18 AM
To: antlr-interest
Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] [antlr-dev] target ETAs?

On 01/05/07, Kunle Odutola <Kunle_Odutola at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > DevPartner studio on Windows for analysis.
> >
> > Then elapsed time vs system CPU time vs memory overhead. Just
measuring
> > the elapsed time and system time to parse exactly the same stuff,
namely
> > jsk1.6 source code.
>
> Don't think Windows has a builtin 'time' equivalent. Could crank out a
> Windows equivalent using CreateProcess()/GetProcessTimes() I guess...
>
> Kunle

Or use ptime from http://www.synesis.com.au/systools.html instead -
that's what I did.

Stuart Dootson