[antlr-interest] [C Target] Why It is here: if (BACKTRACKING>0)
Vaclav Barta
vbar at comp.cz
Wed Jan 23 10:22:21 PST 2008
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 17:37:59 Jim Idle wrote:
> Eliminating predicates that invoke rules is always a performance
> improvement, but you seem to be saying you have no backtracking and no
> predicates, so perhaps the grammar is fine. My TSQL 20065 grammar
> generates about the same amount of code with pretty much no predicates
Chmm, is it available? I've adapted my SQL grammar from
http://www.antlr.org/grammar/1062280680642/MS_SQL_SELECT.html , and while I
don't see any performance problems with it, it definitely has predicates, so
I'd like to see an alternative...
Bye
Vasek
--
http://www.mangrove.cz/
Open Source integration
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list