[antlr-interest] ANTLR 3.1, headers in imported grammars
Gavin Lambert
antlr at mirality.co.nz
Wed Jun 18 13:21:05 PDT 2008
At 07:09 19/06/2008, Terence Parr wrote:
>added bug to fix for 3.1
>
>http://www.antlr.org:8888/browse/ANTLR-301
>
>Actually, wait. So we are saying that the header in root
>grammar should override any in subgrammars? In this case,
>there are none so it inserts it? That will be special case.
>@members are not overridden for example.
That might be convenient for things like the package declaration,
but probably very little else. Maybe the Java target should adopt
something similar to C#'s @namespace section specifically for the
package specification, so it can replicate that and nothing else?
Also: it probably ought to be possible to put the sub-grammars in
one package and the main grammar in a different one.
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list