[antlr-interest] ANother mismatched token 0!=0

[Darien Hager]

On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:12 AM, G R <relationalalgebra at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Gavin.
> I have rearange my rules for my literals, but i still got some errors with
> my NEWLINE token.
>

You may want to check out a previous thread titled: "[antlr-interest]
Understanding Lexer rules" which has some discussion about when the token
definition ordering matters and how the longest usable definition is
generally the one that gets used, etc.
-- 
Darien Hager
Developer
Etelos, Inc.
darien at etelos.com

http://www.etelos.com
"Revolutionizing the way applications are developed, distributed and
consumed."

This e-mail message, including attachments, may contain confidential
information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not
the intended recipient, then this is notice that any use, disclosure,
dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error please contact the sender by reply mail and
destroy all copies of the original message.

This e-mail message, including attachments, may contain confidential information 
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient,
then this is notice that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in error please contact the 
sender by reply mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.antlr.org/pipermail/antlr-interest/attachments/20080316/92a51abb/attachment.html