[antlr-interest] gUnit suggestion: treat Lexer and Parser errors the same
George S. Cowan
cowang at comcast.net
Sun Nov 23 18:49:21 PST 2008
In-Reply-To: <CDABE1C5-6A25-4875-8FA2-6EBE269D77BB at mac.com>
References: <CDABE1C5-6A25-4875-8FA2-6EBE269D77BB at mac.com>
Leon,
I saw your gUnit changes at
http://www.antlr.org/wiki/display/ANTLR3/gUnit+-+Grammar+Unit+Testing
Thanks. That was a swift response.
I'll start using gUnit on my project and let you know if I see any problems.
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 at 19:35:24, Leon Su wrote:
> ...I'll try
> to add this support into the next release soon :)
>
> Leon
>
> On Nov 10, 2008, at 1:57 PM, George S. Cowan wrote:
>
> > I have experimented with gUnit a little and I think it has real
> > possibilities. I would find it more useful if lexer failures were
> > treated the same as parser failures.
> >
> > For instance, gUnit does not allow me to specify a Lexer test, e.g.,
> > ID: "93XXX" FAIL
> > ...
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list