[antlr-interest] C# targets problem with custom tree nodes

[Johannes Luber]

> Hi, I noticed very strange behaviour with custom nodes specified in the
> parser:
> 
> A) if constructor parameters are specified, the node is never added to
> the final tree structure, only the subnodes
> B) if the token is an imaginary one, the same behaviour, the custom
> node is missing from the tree.

I don't know if these behaviors are correct or if they are bugs as I never used such syntax myself. But as I haven't changed the runtime in that area for special .NET needs, any bugs are probably present in the Java runtime. Can you please post a minimal grammar along required supporting files, so I and Ter can investigate this issue?

Johannes
> 
> 
> For example:
> 
>  CLASS IDENT -> ^(CLASS<NodeIndentifier> IDENT) is OK
> 
>  CLASS IDENT -> ^(VIRTUAL_CLASS<NodeIndentifier> IDENT) is NOT OK no
> node of type NodeIndentifier is added to the tree
> 
>  CLASS id=IDENT -> ^(CLASS<NodeIndentifer>[$id.Text] is NOT OK, no
> node of type NodeIndentifier is added to the tree
> 
> 
> Are any other people having issues with this?
> 
> List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
> Unsubscribe:
> http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address

-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01