[antlr-interest] Doubt regarding Tree grammar
jevitha
jevitha at gmail.com
Wed May 6 05:44:37 PDT 2009
Hi all,
Im facing this problem of converting parser grammar to tree grammar.
I have some rules which incrementally build ASTs like the following
example:
postfixExpression : (primary->primary)
( '(' args=expressionList ')'
-> ^(CALL $postfixExpression $args)
| '[' ie=expression ']'
-> ^(INDEX $postfixExpression $ie)
| '.' p=primary
-> ^(FIELDACCESS $postfixExpression $p)
)*
;
--
Best Regards,
Jevitha
"Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see
what you believed in."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.antlr.org/pipermail/antlr-interest/attachments/20090506/3852ffca/attachment.html
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list