[antlr-interest] Any plans of next ANTLR Release
Jim Idle
jimi at temporal-wave.com
Fri Apr 30 18:28:11 PDT 2010
I think we have a lot more scope in this space than we ever had.
Technology moves and we can too. The nearer the machine the better the
performance but it isn't always the lowest level you code at that
counts.
At this very simple vm level I can code assembler better than the c
compiler but beyond this it needs computation that humans cannot do in
any practical time. So a simple vm and we get nearer the machine. I
really like this path.
Jim
On Apr 30, 2010, at 18:14, Terence Parr <parrt at cs.usfca.edu> wrote:
> According to Cox, Thompson's original algorithm generated machine
> code in the 1960s.
> Ter
> On Apr 30, 2010, at 6:11 PM, Jim Idle wrote:
>
>> Why not? I might have access to that. Also the parser may be doable
>> in
>> the same way in certain cases. Actions and so on need care though.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>
>
> List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
> Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list