[antlr-interest] Sample scannerless parser with AST construction in unmodified ANTLR
Peter Kooiman
peter at crispu.com
Sun Apr 17 10:25:24 PDT 2011
> Still, we could easily do it with a simple {...}? so ANTLR can still do it without formalism,
> just as PEGs force you to manually say that as well. :)
Are you thinking of a validating semantic predicate after matching the keyword? Not sure if that would work always, could that not give rise to a failed predicate error message when we really just want the parser to use the identifier rule instead? Or are you thinking of a semantic predicate checking look-ahead for keyword followed by not-letter not-digit?
Peter
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list