[antlr-interest] Superclasses = best practise ...?

[Hans-Juergen Rennau]

Hi Michael, Eric, Jim,

thank you very much for discussing the question of the use of superclasses for 
separating logic from grammar. Indeed, you have convinced me thoroughly that the 
superclass approach is in *most* cases very appropriate - as Jim elaborated, 
only small and simple grammars without the perspective of reuse would make the 
all-in-one alternative really attractive. 


A sidenote to Jim: the archetype does currently not introduce a superclass of 
the tree parser... I think the tree parser is not less of a candidate than the 
parser - so you might consider adding a superclass for it, too. Second sidenote: 
using the archetype, the plugin version 3.3 is proposed, but selecting it 
results in an error - this may confuse.

Kind regards,
-- Hans-Juergen