[antlr-interest] Fundamental question

[Mari Matinlassi]

Jim, Ian,

Thanks for pointing me to missing EOF.

However, it did not .. kind of.. solve my problem.

Resulting tree will now (after adding EOF and with same input) be

int test ;
<missing EOF>

Whereas, I would _like to have_ a tree something like below:

int test;
<error>
int variable;
string here;

How to refactor my grammar to make a tree like above?

Thanks in advance,

mari


-----Original Message-----
From: antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org
[mailto:antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org] On Behalf Of Jim Idle
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 6:18 PM
Cc: antlr-interest at antlr.org
Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] Fundamental question

Except that the rule "type" does not allow an ID as the type, and so this is
a plain syntax error that is not picked up because of the lack of EOF at the
end of the start rule.

Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org [mailto:antlr-interest- 
> bounces at antlr.org] On Behalf Of Ian Kaplan
> Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 9:09 AM
> To: Mari Matinlassi
> Cc: antlr-interest at antlr.org
> Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] Fundamental question
>
>   There is nothing wrong as far as the syntax goes with this.  There 
> could, for example, be a user defined type called strig (strings for 
> trigonometry :).  So this is grammatically correct.  What is not 
> correct is the semantics.  In fact, there probably is no user defined 
> type strig.  So this is an error may be issued after the syntax tree 
> is built, when a semantic phase makes a pass over the tree.  The 
> semantic phase would discover that there was no type strig and report 
> an error ("No type 'strig' on line 42").
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Mari Matinlassi
> <mmatinlassi at icinetic.com>wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is something fundamental and important that I have not 
> > understood with ANTLR grammars.
> >
> > If I need to parse something like...
> >
> >        int test;
> >        strig another;
> >        int variable;
> >        string here;
> >
> > You notice there is a typing error on the second line ('strig'
> instead
> > of 'string').
> >
> > How do I make a grammar that will not stop parsing but, continues 
> > after an error??
> >
> > Below is an example how I CANNOT make it work the right way (created 
> > AST contains only 'int test ;')..
> >
> > grammar List;
> >
> > options {
> >        language = CSharp3;
> >        TokenLabelType = CommonToken;
> >        output=AST;
> >        ASTLabelType = CommonTree;
> > }
> >
> > @lexer::namespace{ConsoleApplication4}
> > @parser::namespace{ConsoleApplication4}
> >
> >
> > public r
> >        : variables*
> >        ;
> >
> > variables
> >        : type ID ';'
> >        ;
> >
> > type
> >        : 'int'
> >        | 'string'
> >        ;
> >
> > ID : 'a'..'z' + ;
> >
> > WS : (' ' |'\n' |'\r' ) {$channel=Hidden;} ;
> >
> >
> > Many thanks for your time and help,
> >
> > Mari
> >
> >
> >
> > List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
> > Unsubscribe:
> > http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-
> address
> >
>
> List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
> Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-
> email-address

List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address