[antlr-interest] anybody care to comment on bitbucket.org?

Robin diabeteman at gmail.com
Mon Jan 9 12:04:00 PST 2012


I forgot to say that on all other aspects, mercurial and git are pretty
much the same.

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Kirby Bohling <kirby.bohling at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Terence Parr <parrt at cs.usfca.edu> wrote:
> > Contemplating switch to mercurial and hosting at bitbucket.org.
> > Ter
> >
>
> I have a personal bias towards git, but think it would great if ANTLR
> was developed in a version control tool that was publicly visible and
> I could create local branches and mods if necessary.  I haven't come
> across any problems in ANTLR which required it, but there are plenty
> of tools I maintain a local git repos with local modifications and
> fixes applied to the last release branch while waiting a pending
> release from upstream which includes said fixes.
>
> Kirby
>
> List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
> Unsubscribe:
> http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
>


More information about the antlr-interest mailing list