[stringtemplate-interest] Force single-valued template

[Terence Parr]

On Nov 20, 2005, at 11:51 AM, Sohail Somani wrote:
> Oh of course it is doing this (otherwise it wouldn't be working  
> today),
> but I think eventually someone else will modify it and screw things  
> up.
> Or am I being too paranoid? I suppose using first(lhs), first(rhs) in
> the template would show the intent. The parse also documents this. Do
> you think this is enough?

Probably...

> I prefer having less comments and better code but I think this is a  
> case
> in which only comments will help :(

Agreed.  In general, code should be the comment/doc. :)

Ter