[stringtemplate-interest] $r.st vs $r.template
Terence Parr
parrt at cs.usfca.edu
Tue Nov 22 11:31:01 PST 2005
On Nov 21, 2005, at 6:31 PM, Kamal Verma wrote:
> I will personally like ".template", though longer to type, it is
> clear and avoid chances of error while reading the big code.
Hi. I'm leaning that way also.
> I am new to string template and antlr, but I was wondering if there
> is any round-trip example which preserves whitespaces will be
> great. Like,
>
> source1-->LEXER-->token_stream-->PARSER-->some_tree--
> >STRING_TEMPLATE->source2
Going to trees is harder given that some tokens don't make it into
the tree! Have you seen:
http://www.antlr.org/article/preserving.token.order/
preserving.token.order.tml
> given is,
>
> source1=source2 (syntactically) (like, reformatted)
> source1=source2 (semantically) (translated)
> source1=source2 (both) - complete round trip preserving whitespace.
>
> Since, I am new to this I was wondering if there are examples already.
You might look at that above article...
Ter
More information about the stringtemplate-interest
mailing list