[stringtemplate-interest] null vs missing vs empty vs nonexistent
Terence Parr
parrt at cs.usfca.edu
Thu Oct 15 12:25:19 PDT 2009
Ok, we have an important choice to make. Thanks to Bill Venners were
bringing this up last year. It's important enough and long enough that
I added to my blog:
http://tinyurl.com/parrt-on-null-attributes
Here is my summary from the bottom of the page:
> Ok, I think I just convinced myself that we'll allow null-valued
> attributes and that we will treat them differently than missing
> attributes. Secondly, null option only applies to present but null-
> valued attributes.
Is it just me or am I cranking through the reimplementation of ST? The
only thing that slows me down is thinking hard about the quirks of v3.
Ter
More information about the stringtemplate-interest
mailing list