[stringtemplate-interest] package name

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 12:14:33AM -0700, Jonathan Buhacoff wrote:
> Can we please keep complete class names?  I agree with Sam Harwell,  
> who wrote in a different thread, that StringTemplate or Template is  
> clearer than ST.

I have to Ack this one!

http://lwn.net/Articles/351422/
Just read last month, when Ken Thomson was asked what he'd do
differently about Unix IO api, he would have spelt creat as "create".

zen


> On Oct 9, 2009, at 1:10 PM, Terence Parr wrote:
> > On Oct 8, 2009, at 7:08 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 04:33:36PM -0700, Terence Parr wrote:
> >>> should i reuse org.stringtemplate or should package be
> >>> org.stringtemplate.v4 or something?  The classes are differently
> >>> named
> >>> so org.stringtemplate.ST and such might be ok.
> >>
> >> Are there any classes or packages that would overlap?
> >
> > Don't think so...ha! I just realized that the old package was:
> >
> > package org.antlr.stringtemplate;
> >
> > so
> >
> > package org.stringtemplate;
> >
> > it is then! no collision.
> >
> > Ter

-- 
Homepage: www.SoulSound.net -- Free Australia: www.UPMART.org
Please respect the confidentiality of this email as sensibly warranted.