[antlr-interest] Should dup() and dupXXXX() have shallow or deep clone semantics?
    micheal_jor 
    open.zone at virgin.net
       
    Mon Nov 11 15:24:08 PST 2002
    
    
  
Just wondering aloud about this. I mean should object references 
inside the AST nodes just be copied or should the objects be cloned 
as well?
What about object references to non-ANTLR types like String etc?
I presume each call to dup()/dupXXX() be considered as making a 
separate clone of the object/object-graph so all cloned objects and 
cloned referenced objects must be unique across calls.
Micheal
 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
    
    
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list