[antlr-interest] Does ANTLR TreeParsing [still] have these "f
laws"?
mzukowski at yci.com
mzukowski at yci.com
Tue Jan 21 09:35:33 PST 2003
Those aren't flaws, they are design decisions. The author of that page
followed the design to customize his ASTs to do what he needed, just as I
did in the GCC translator framework http://www.codetransform.com/gcc.html.
Monty
-----Original Message-----
From: micheal_jor <open.zone at virgin.net> [mailto:open.zone at virgin.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:32 AM
To: antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [antlr-interest] Does ANTLR TreeParsing [still] have these
"flaws"?
Hi,
I came across this piece on flaws with ANTLR TreeParsers on my
travels and wondered if anyone had an opinion.
http://www.cc.gatech.edu/classes/AY2000/cs4240_fall/ANTLR_Patch/
Cheers!,
Micheal
-- ANTLR: "A Nible Tool. Lucid Parsing."
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list